DENVER — Colorado’s marijuana experiment was designed to raise revenue for the state and its schools, but a state law may put some of the tax money directly into residents’ pockets, causing quite a headache for lawmakers.
~
The state constitution limits how much tax money the state can take in before it has to give some back. That means Coloradans may each get their own cut of the $50 million in recreational pot taxes collected in the first year of legal weed. It’s a situation so bizarre that it’s gotten Republicans and Democrats, for once, to agree on a tax issue.
 
Even some pot shoppers are surprised Colorado may not keep the taxes that were promised to go toward school construction when voters legalized marijuana in 2012.
 
“I have no problem paying taxes if they’re going to schools,” said Maddy Beaumier, 25, who was visiting a dispensary near the Capitol.
 
 But David Huff, a 50-year-old carpenter from Aurora, said taxes that add 30 percent or more to the price of pot, depending on the jurisdiction, are too steep.
“I don’t care if they write me a check, or refund it in my taxes, or just give me a free joint next time I come in. The taxes are too high, and they should give it back,” Huff said.
 
“I don’t care if they write me a check, or refund it in my taxes, or just give me a free joint next time I come in. The taxes are too high, and they should give it back,” Huff said.
 
Legal weed has collided with the tax limitation movement because a 1992 voter-approved constitutional amendment called the Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights requires all new taxes to go before voters.
 
The amendment also requires Colorado to pay back taxpayers when the state collects more than what’s permitted by a formula based on inflation and population growth. Over the years, Colorado has issued refunds six times, totaling more than $3.3 billion.
 
Republicans and Democrats say there’s no good reason to put pot taxes back into people’s pockets, and state officials are scrambling to figure out how to avoid doling out the money. It may have to be settled by asking Colorado voters, for a third time, to cast a ballot on the issue and exempt pot taxes from the refund requirement.
 
Republicans concede that marijuana is throwing them off their usual position of wanting tax dollars returned to taxpayers. But they also tend to say that marijuana should pay for itself — that general taxes shouldn’t pay for things like increased drug education and better training for police officers to identify stoned drivers.
 
By The Associated Press ~ Wednesday, January 28, 2015
 
~

Recent News Articles

Friday August 23

Napa County Ballot to Include Initiative for Commercial Cannabis Cultivation

in U.S. News

by Mike Fuller

Will wine tasters be set off their cabernet sauvignon should Napa County decide to allow…

181 hits

Saturday August 24

California Says Its Cannabis Revenue Has Fallen Short Of Estimates, Despite Gains

in U.S. News

by Mike Fuller

California's cannabis excise tax generated only $74.2 million in the second quarter of 2019, the…

149 hits

Saturday August 24

CBD Companies Positioning Themselves For Cannabis Legalization

in Cannabis News

by Mike Fuller

Recreational cannabis use is illegal in the majority of US states, but the relaxation of…

591 hits

Monday August 26

DEA Announces It Will Finally Take Action On Marijuana Grower Applications - Cannabis News

in Politics

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced on Monday that is is taking steps to expand…

124 hits

Monday August 26

How much pot in that brownie? Chocolate can throw off tests - Cannabis News

in Science

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

Chocolate can throw off potency tests so labels aren’t always accurate, and now scientists are…

142 hits