Image of Hilary Bricken, Seattle Pot Lawyer
HILARY BRICKEN ~ Above the Law ~
 
Capitalization of cannabis businesses still comes primarily from friends and family rather than from institutional investors.
~
This happens in part because the federal Controlled Substances Act can lead to criminal liability for investors financing cannabis businesses. On top of this, many states preclude financial investments in cannabis businesses without first satisfying rigorous regulatory standards, often including state residency. None of this has stopped cannabis businesses from soliciting investments and then coming to my law firm for legal representation on their deals.
 
The problem is that most of these companies that come to us have little to no clue about securities law and by the time they reach out to us, they have already put themselves at risk for violating state or federal (usually both) securities laws. Many wrongly believe that the federal prohibition against cannabis means that securities laws do not apply to their ventures.
 
Federal and state securities laws are intended to protect investors. Federal securities acts were passed in 1933 and 1934 to make sure that investors receive full and fair disclosures from businesses before investing. If companies have made all required disclosures and registrations, the courts will generally stick the investors with the risks of their investments. But investors who have been lied to or not provided with sufficient information to understand the risks of their investments have many strong legal avenues against the company or individual that sold them the securities.
 
When working on anything investment-related — cannabis or not — the first question should always be whether it involves a security. The federal definition and statute on securities can be found here, and an example of a state law definition can be found here. In brief, securities are things like corporate stock, LLC membership units, and corporate bonds. Ultimately, securities are intangible rights to profit-sharing payments or guaranteed debt payments granted by businesses in exchange for money.
 
Securities laws are generally written to broadly require that a securities offering involve substantial registration and information filings unless it comes under one of many exceptions. Though the majority of small business securities offerings are exempt from massive formal filings, even those often require notice-type state and federal filings to ensure potential investors are informed. And even those offerings that do not require government registrations or notices still usually must make certain informational disclosures to investors about the business before they can seek investment.
 
At minimum, any cannabis business that seeks to raise money through a debt or an equity offering should provide its investors with its basic business plan, making clear what it intends to do with the capital it raises, its financial projections (including expected return window for the investor), and a list of risk factors that may lead the business to be unable to repay the investor. These risk factors are key, and they need to be drafted by experienced securities counsel. They are not boilerplate, as each business has its own risks.
 
The risk factors for cannabis business investment should, at minimum, make clear that both the cannabis business itself and the potential investor are subject to the federal Controlled Substances Act, and that “the federal government may raid the business, seize all of its equipment and inventory, and arrest all of the employees, officers, and investors, including you.”
 
Though seemingly counterintuitive, notifying investors of the full extent of their risks should go a long way toward providing the cannabis company with legal protection down the unforeseeable road. The following are some other cannabis business risk factors that generally should be included in a cannabis business offering:
 
The potential for federal legal action against the relevant states regarding those states’ marijuana regimes;
The risk and extent of federal asset forfeiture;
The unpredictability of the marketplace, due in part to wavering consumer interest and competition from illegal sellers;
The unpredictability of onerous state and city tax rates;
The unpredictability of state and city marijuana regulations; and
The costs of having to comply with robust marijuana regulations.
 
If you are going to take on investment in your cannabis business or invest in the cannabis business of someone else, you should ultimately seek to ensure compliance with all applicable securities laws.
 
~

Recent News Articles

Friday March 06

MMA Fighters Start Clinical Trial Exploring Weed as Brain Injury Treatment - Cannabis News

in Medical News

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

CBD is renowned for its neuroprotective qualities, and clinical researchers in Australia are testing whether…

2416 hits

Friday March 06

DEA Admits State-Level Marijuana Legalization Reduces Illegal Market Demand - Cannabis News

in Law & Crime

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) recently acknowledged in a report that state-level marijuana legalization reduces…

2469 hits

Friday March 06

5 Things Employers Should Know About CBD - Cannabis News

in CBD & Hemp

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

It’s important for employers to understand the compound and the benefits and hindrances it could…

2533 hits

Monday March 09

50 State Banking Associations Demand Senate Vote On Marijuana Banking Legislation - Cannabis News

in Finance

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

Banking associations from 49 states and Puerto Rico sent a letter to the chairman and…

1464 hits

Monday March 09

Missouri Patients And Caregivers Learn The Basics Of Growing Marijuana At Home - Cannabis News

in Cannabis News

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

About a dozen people gathered around a table in a St. Louis conference room Saturday…

1844 hits