Image of Hilary Bricken, Seattle Pot Lawyer
HILARY BRICKEN ~ Above the Law ~
 
Capitalization of cannabis businesses still comes primarily from friends and family rather than from institutional investors.
~
This happens in part because the federal Controlled Substances Act can lead to criminal liability for investors financing cannabis businesses. On top of this, many states preclude financial investments in cannabis businesses without first satisfying rigorous regulatory standards, often including state residency. None of this has stopped cannabis businesses from soliciting investments and then coming to my law firm for legal representation on their deals.
 
The problem is that most of these companies that come to us have little to no clue about securities law and by the time they reach out to us, they have already put themselves at risk for violating state or federal (usually both) securities laws. Many wrongly believe that the federal prohibition against cannabis means that securities laws do not apply to their ventures.
 
Federal and state securities laws are intended to protect investors. Federal securities acts were passed in 1933 and 1934 to make sure that investors receive full and fair disclosures from businesses before investing. If companies have made all required disclosures and registrations, the courts will generally stick the investors with the risks of their investments. But investors who have been lied to or not provided with sufficient information to understand the risks of their investments have many strong legal avenues against the company or individual that sold them the securities.
 
When working on anything investment-related — cannabis or not — the first question should always be whether it involves a security. The federal definition and statute on securities can be found here, and an example of a state law definition can be found here. In brief, securities are things like corporate stock, LLC membership units, and corporate bonds. Ultimately, securities are intangible rights to profit-sharing payments or guaranteed debt payments granted by businesses in exchange for money.
 
Securities laws are generally written to broadly require that a securities offering involve substantial registration and information filings unless it comes under one of many exceptions. Though the majority of small business securities offerings are exempt from massive formal filings, even those often require notice-type state and federal filings to ensure potential investors are informed. And even those offerings that do not require government registrations or notices still usually must make certain informational disclosures to investors about the business before they can seek investment.
 
At minimum, any cannabis business that seeks to raise money through a debt or an equity offering should provide its investors with its basic business plan, making clear what it intends to do with the capital it raises, its financial projections (including expected return window for the investor), and a list of risk factors that may lead the business to be unable to repay the investor. These risk factors are key, and they need to be drafted by experienced securities counsel. They are not boilerplate, as each business has its own risks.
 
The risk factors for cannabis business investment should, at minimum, make clear that both the cannabis business itself and the potential investor are subject to the federal Controlled Substances Act, and that “the federal government may raid the business, seize all of its equipment and inventory, and arrest all of the employees, officers, and investors, including you.”
 
Though seemingly counterintuitive, notifying investors of the full extent of their risks should go a long way toward providing the cannabis company with legal protection down the unforeseeable road. The following are some other cannabis business risk factors that generally should be included in a cannabis business offering:
 
The potential for federal legal action against the relevant states regarding those states’ marijuana regimes;
The risk and extent of federal asset forfeiture;
The unpredictability of the marketplace, due in part to wavering consumer interest and competition from illegal sellers;
The unpredictability of onerous state and city tax rates;
The unpredictability of state and city marijuana regulations; and
The costs of having to comply with robust marijuana regulations.
 
If you are going to take on investment in your cannabis business or invest in the cannabis business of someone else, you should ultimately seek to ensure compliance with all applicable securities laws.
 
~

Recent News Articles

Monday June 24

Could CBD Fight Superbugs? Marijuana Compound Shows Promise As an Antibiotic - Cannabis News

in Medical News

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

The quest for new antibiotics has led researchers to a surprising candidate: the marijuana compound…

266 hits

Monday June 24

Cannabis Brands Need to Establish a Purpose That Doesn’t Rely on Marijuana Puns - Cannabis…

in Finance

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

Most have no brand relevancy or purpose and are woefully inept at creating brand experience.

288 hits

Monday June 24

Japanese students more open to use of marijuana, survey suggests - Cannabis News

in World News

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

Japanese junior high school students have become more open to the use of marijuana, in…

270 hits

Monday June 24

South Carolina hemp farming could top 3,000 acres as states scramble for a piece of…

in Cannabis News

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

In just its second year growing hemp, South Carolina is projecting a 1,200% increase in…

693 hits

Tuesday June 25

Illinois becomes 11th state to allow recreational marijuana - Cannabis News

in Top Stories

by Bruce Kennedy - Editor in Chief

Illinois’ new governor delivered on a top campaign promise Tuesday by signing legislation legalizing small…

571 hits